{"id":5366,"date":"2015-07-07T04:34:31","date_gmt":"2015-07-07T04:34:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/skylight.gr\/administrator_wordpress\/index.php\/2015\/07\/07\/65daysofstatic-commenting-on-receiving-funds-from-the-uk-government\/"},"modified":"2015-07-07T04:34:31","modified_gmt":"2015-07-07T04:34:31","slug":"65daysofstatic-commenting-on-receiving-funds-from-the-uk-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/2015\/07\/07\/65daysofstatic-commenting-on-receiving-funds-from-the-uk-government\/","title":{"rendered":"65daysofstatic commenting on receiving funds from the UK government"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/5\/5c\/65daysofstatic_Slottsfjell.jpg\" border=\"0\" width=\"218\" height=\"326\" \/><br \/>So recently 65days received some funding from the British  Phonographic Industry (BPI).\u00a0This is no doubt a good thing for us. It\u2019s  appreciated and will be put to good use.The funding\u00a0was announced yesterday in a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/nineteen-of-the-uks-most-promising-music-acts-and-songwriters-receive-support-to-amplify-their-sound-abroad\" target=\"_blank\">press release over at gov.uk<\/a>,  in which we are named along with 18 other bands or artists, as  beneficiaries of \u00a0this\u00a0public funding to help \u201cexport [our] music  abroad\u201d.   <!--more-->  Sometimes when you list things alphabetically, numbers appear  before \u2018A\u2019, and so 65daysofstatic is at the top of the list of bands and  artists,\u00a0and not far below a quote from\u00a0Business Secretary Sajid  Javid\u00a0declaring that this Music Export Growth Scheme is the government  \u201cbanging the drum\u201d (see what he did there?) for music and the UK\u2019s  culture industries.<\/p>\n<p>The idea of 65daysofstatic being held up in any way as evidence that  this hyper-Dickensian, fucking nightmare of a Tory government is  apparently supporting the arts, when in actual fact they are destroying  any kind of infrastructure for future creativity at the grassroots level  and plunging the most vulnerable parts of society into further misery,  leaves a bad taste in our mouths. So here are some notes from us, just  for the record:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Spending public money on the arts is clearly not a bad thing. It\u2019s better than spending it on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnduk.org\/campaigns\/no-to-trident\" target=\"_blank\">Trident<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/reality-check-with-polly-curtis\/2011\/sep\/12\/reality-check-banking-bailout\" target=\"_blank\">bailing out banks<\/a>, subsidising <a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2015\/04\/14\/right-to-buy-is-wrong-in-every-way-imaginable\/\" target=\"_blank\">sketchy right-to-buy tactics<\/a> to help private landlords get richer, and so on.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Arts-based public spending is so often justified, as it is again in today\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/nineteen-of-the-uks-most-promising-music-acts-and-songwriters-receive-support-to-amplify-their-sound-abroad\" target=\"_blank\">BPI press release<\/a>,  as being \u2018good for the British economy\u2019 (\u201can approximate return on  investment of \u00a38.50 for every \u00a31 invested\u201d). This entirely misses the  point of why we need to support arts and creativity in the first place.<sup id=\"fnref-1706-fn-why\"><a href=\"http:\/\/65daysofstatic.com\/2015\/07\/05\/some-notes-on-funding-65-just-received\/#fn-1706-fn-why\" rel=\"footnote\">1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The press release mentions that this public funding will be matched  by the music companies behind the acts. This is the first we have heard  of this. Either this is accurate, which seems unlikely at least in our  case because if any of the music companies we work with were actually  giving us money for nothing, they\u2019d presumably have told us about it. On  the other hand, it could be that the idea is music companies \u2018match\u2019  the funding figure, but then that money is actually added to the band\u2019s  \u2018recoup\u2019 with them via a record deal or whatever. This also seems  unlikely, as it would mean that, on paper, if it is ultimately the  artist that is required to match whatever funding they get, then  actually they\u2019re not getting any help at all. (Unlikely, but this is  the music industry we\u2019re talking about). The third option would be that  this \u2018matching\u2019 is entirely fabricated for the purposes of the press  release, which would suggest that somebody, somewhere, is so  scared of the wrath of the Daily Mail, or whoever, for having wasted  money on something as frivolous as the arts, that they literally  invented non-existent extra funds from The Music Business to give the  illusion of an industry that is growing in rude, capitalist health. To  make it clear that this is A Sensible Business Decision and not  Commie-Liberal Hippy Indulgence. No idea which of these, if any, is  true. But it\u00a0is odd.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Similarly, if they think that they\u2019re gonna get 65 to \u201cattend  writing camps overseas to help boost the revenues that come from  publishing and sync deals\u201d they\u2019ve got another thing coming. Presumably  this is more empty press release wrangling; a well-intentioned  arts-funding-proposal-writer somewhere knew what business-friendly  buzzwords were needed to catch the ear of a business\u00a0secretary who might  understand that \u2018publishing and syncs\u2019 as opposed to \u2018record sales and  touring\u2019 are the remaining deposits of wealth that need <del>pillaging<\/del> mining in the world of music. But how patronising and wrong-brained  this patronage is, whereby acts are given song-writing classes about how  to better grow and focus their \u2018product\u2019 in order to help grow the  British economy. WHO THINKS LIKE THIS? Probably Mumford &amp; Sons. In  fact they probably run the writing camps on the grounds of their L.A  mansions or something.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The proposal that 65daysofstatic put in for this funding was based  on a hypothetical budget for a hypothetical American tour. It is very  expensive to tour in America, but we\u2019ll be eventually be putting out a  new album in the shape of our <a href=\"http:\/\/65daysofstatic.com\/2014\/12\/05\/no-mans-sky\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"No Man\u2019s Sky\">No Man\u2019s Sky<\/a> soundtrack and we would like to be able to afford to play shows in a  country where that game appears to be receiving a huge amount of  attention. (To \u2018grow our brand\u2019, in music industry parlance). This BPI  funding covers maybe a third of the deficit of the budget. Meaning that  this hypothetical tour still costs, rather than makes, a lot of money.  Furthermore, the majority of these costs are travel-related, so almost  all this \u2018music\u2019 funding will actually be going to airlines and oil  companies. The rest will go to pay our crew (which is obviously right  and proper) and to musical equipment hire companies. The only part of it  that would come to 65 is what are called \u2018PDs\u2019 (per diems), a daily  allowance for each of us to be able to buy food, coffee and sometimes,  debauched rockstars that we are, extra beer and wine.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The point here is absolutely not to complain that we as a band are  not getting paid, but simply to point out that it is not accurate for  this kind of funding to be held up as evidence of a government who is  supporting the arts in this country when, in actual fact, they are  destroying the conditions where it can even survive, never mind thrive.<\/p>\n<p>As capitalism bites harder and blood starts to leak out of our  bruised and broken skin, it\u2019s difficult not to be frustrated that  \u2018musicians need to be paid\u2019 is still a primary topic of conversation for  well-intentioned discussions about the importance of paying artists  when the world is ending before our eyes. It feels particularly  indulgent even bringing it up whilst in the grim shadow of a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jacobinmag.com\/2015\/07\/syriza-default-debt-european-union-tsipras\/\" target=\"_blank\">merciless Europe trying to bring the entirety of Greece to its collective knees<\/a>. There is more at stake, this late in the game, than 65daysofstatic staving-off having to get proper jobs.<\/p>\n<p>But still, until musicians do start getting paid fairly (which will be never), you fear that the conversation will never move on. <a href=\"http:\/\/recode.net\/2015\/06\/21\/apple-says-it-will-pay-taylor-swift-for-free-streams-after-all\/\" target=\"_blank\">Thanks to Taylor Swift<\/a>,  65daysofstatic will now collectively earn approximately \u00a340 for the  three months of free Apple Music streaming than we would have earned  otherwise. And really, thanks Taylor, that\u2019s cool, it\u2019s honestly better  than not-having \u00a340, but did you know Apple <a href=\"http:\/\/www.donotlink.com\/framed?737164\" target=\"_blank\">only paid \u00a312 million in tax<\/a> in the UK last year instead of the estimated \u00a3400 million that they  should have? If you could take that up with them next time you fancy  fixing things for struggling artists, it\u2019d be really appreciated. We\u2019ll  even do you a remix for cheap in return.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever. The government helping us get to a hypothetical America is  not, in and of itself, a bad thing, and we are genuinely grateful to the  people we work with who put the proposal together for us and grateful  to whoever in the BPI decided to send some of that cash our way, however  conditional it might be. But even if \u2018economic growth\u2019 is the primary  mandate for the future responsibilities of music, then this isn\u2019t the  way to do it. Stop closing community centres. Stop destroying the  welfare state. Stop making it impossible for poorer people to have any  opportunity to do anything other than constantly struggle for survival,  leaving holes in culture that will inevitably be filled by rich kids  with nothing to write about. Holding up bands like us as fig leaves is  not going to disguise the fact that this government is not even a fig  tree; it\u2019s an army of termites in the shape of a tree, eating it alive.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Source: http:\/\/65daysofstatic.com<br \/>Image credit: Creative Common License<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So recently 65days received some funding from the British Phonographic Industry (BPI).\u00a0This is no doubt&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5366\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}