{"id":5033,"date":"2015-03-05T12:57:06","date_gmt":"2015-03-05T12:57:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/skylight.gr\/administrator_wordpress\/index.php\/2015\/03\/05\/us-rights-holders-welcome-songwriter-equity-act\/"},"modified":"2015-03-05T12:57:06","modified_gmt":"2015-03-05T12:57:06","slug":"us-rights-holders-welcome-songwriter-equity-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/2015\/03\/05\/us-rights-holders-welcome-songwriter-equity-act\/","title":{"rendered":"US rights-holders welcome Songwriter Equity Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/5\/5c\/Great_Seal_of_the_United_States_%28obverse%29.svg\/600px-Great_Seal_of_the_United_States_%28obverse%29.svg.png\" border=\"0\" width=\"215\" height=\"215\" \/><br \/>Songwriters and publishers have applauded the March 4 initiative by a  bi-partisan group of members of US Congress to introduce the Songwriter  Equity Act that would &#8220;allow songwriters to receive compensation based  on the fair market value of their songs.&#8221; The bill &#8211; which was  first proposed in May 2014 &#8211; aims at modernising sections 114 and 115 of  the US Copyright Act. and, according to their sponsors, &#8220;would amend  federal law to allow songwriters to receive market-based compensation  and would remove government price controls.&#8221;   <!--more-->  <\/p>\n<p>It was proposed by  US Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), himself a songwriter, Lamar Alexander  (R-Tenn), Bob Corker, (R-Tenn), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), alongside  US Representatives Doug Collins (R-Ga.) of the House Judiciary  Committee and Hakeem Jeffries (R-NY). <\/p>\n<p>Senator Hatch commented,  \u201cThe music business is among the toughest and most competitive  industries, and our songwriters and composers should not have to accept  below-market rates for their work. Ensuring that they are able to  receive the fair market value for their songs is the right thing to do.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For  the National Music Publishers\u2019 Association (NMPA), the Songwriter  Equity Act &#8220;addresses two significant inequities under current copyright  law that prevent songwriters and music publishers from receiving  compensation that reflects the fair market value of their work.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThree-quarters  of a songwriter\u2019s income is regulated by the federal government,\u201d said  David Israelite, president and CEO of the NMPA. \u201cWhile most property  rights are valued in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.musicweek.com\/news\/read\/us-rights-holders-welcome-the-introduction-of-the-songwriter-equity-act\/061063#\" title=\"Click to Continue &gt; by BestSaveForYou\">free<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cdncache-a.akamaihd.net\/items\/it\/img\/arrow-10x10.png\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a> market, songwriters have suffered under a system that devalues their work and takes away their most basic property rights.<\/p>\n<p>Created  before the existence of recorded music to regulate player piano rolls,  Section 115 of the Copyright Act established in 1909 a complex  compulsory license system, with rates set by Congress. According to the  NMPA, this system &#8220;prohibits songwriters and music publishers from  negotiating for the use of their songs, forcing well-below market rates  instead of fair value.&#8221;\u00a0 In 1909, the rate set by Congress was of 2  cents per copy, while in 2014, the rate established by the Copyright  Royalty Board was 9.1 cents. <\/p>\n<p>Section 114(i) of the Copyright Act  imposes a price control for public performances of songwriter  composition and was initially enacted by Congress to protect songwriters  and ensure that their compensation was not unfairly diminished. For the  NMPA, &#8220;the effect of the provision has, in fact, been the exact  opposite.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Songwriter Equity Act proposes two main solutions:  1) Directing the Copyright Royalty Board to set compensation for music  downloads and CDs according to their fair market value, which is the  rate a willing buyer would pay a willing seller; and,\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2) removing  the statutory prohibition that prevents the federal rate court from  considering certain evidence, such as the performing artist\u2019s level of  compensation, when setting the songwriter royalty rate for a public  performance of a composition.<\/p>\n<p>Israelite said, \u201cAs the recent  Copyright Office report on music licensing recommended, if songwriters\u2019  royalties must be regulated, they should at least be based on fair  market value. I am grateful for members of the Senate and House who are  standing up for creators and ensuring that songwriters\u2019 work is valued  properly, considering the value they bring to our lives and the  businesses they fuel.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Since its first introduction in May 2014,  the bill has gained support from such organisations as the Nashville  Songwriters Association International (NSAI) and the country&#8217;s three  main PROs, ASCAP, BMI and SESAC. <\/p>\n<p>ASCAP president and chairman  Paul Williams called the proposals contained in the Act as &#8220;simple and  reasonable changes&#8221; that are &#8220;vital to ensuring that next generation  American songwriters are able to make a living creating the music we all  love.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Williams also welcomed the bipartisan approach on this  bill and commented: \u201cThe Songwriter Equity Act represents an important  first step toward updating an outdated music licensing system that  treats songwriters differently than other copyright owners and prevents  us from earning a fair market royalty rate when our music is streamed or  downloaded online. We look forward to working with policymakers to  reform the broader regulatory framework, including ASCAP\u2019s outdated  consent decree with the DOJ, so that music licensing better reflects the  way people listen to music today.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, BMI president\/CEO  Michael O&#8217;Neill called the bill &#8220;critical.&#8221; He added, \u201cThrough the  Songwriter Equity Act, songwriters will no longer be disadvantaged by  the fact that courts cannot legally consider all relevant benchmark  deals &#8212; key evidence in determining fair market rates.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Source: Music Week<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Songwriters and publishers have applauded the March 4 initiative by a bi-partisan group of members&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5033"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5033\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}