{"id":4841,"date":"2014-12-09T06:19:44","date_gmt":"2014-12-09T06:19:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/skylight.gr\/administrator_wordpress\/index.php\/2014\/12\/09\/creedence-clearwater-revival-sue-john-fogerty\/"},"modified":"2014-12-09T06:19:44","modified_gmt":"2014-12-09T06:19:44","slug":"creedence-clearwater-revival-sue-john-fogerty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/2014\/12\/09\/creedence-clearwater-revival-sue-john-fogerty\/","title":{"rendered":"Creedence Clearwater Revival Sue John Fogerty"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/2\/26\/John_Fogerty.jpg\/220px-John_Fogerty.jpg\" border=\"0\" width=\"217\" height=\"287\" \/><br \/>A long festering dispute over who gets to use the name of the popular 1960s rock band Creedence Clearwater Revival has done a 180 with lead singer John Fogerty now on the answering end of a lawsuit that claims he violated trademarks by recently using the band name.  <!--more-->  <\/p>\n<p>The dispute actually stretches back to 1996 when Fogerty was the plaintiff in a lawsuit that alleged that drummer Douglas Clifford, bassist Stuart Cook and the wife of late rhythm guitarist Tom Fogerty (John&#8217;s brother) had been the ones misusing trademarks through the Creedence Clearwater Revisited tour.<\/p>\n<p>Fogerty was initially successful back then in getting a California  District Court to issue an injunction. However, the 9th Circuit Court of  Appeals overturned the injunction by ruling in 1997 that the lower  judge had erred in finding a probable likelihood of confusion and in  presuming irreparable harm to Fogerty. The case then proceeded, and in  2001, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.<\/p>\n<p>According to a new lawsuit by Clifford, Cook, Patricia Fogerty  and Poor Boy Productions, it was John Fogerty who withdrew his  objection to Creedence Clearwater Revisited in return for payment for  uses of the \u201cRevisited\u201d name.<\/p>\n<p>The latest lawsuit points out that after the settlement, Fogerty gave  interviews where he continued to slam use of the \u201cCreedence Clearwater  Revisited\u201d name.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUsing the name is sort of a sacrilege,&#8221; he told one publication.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When the band broke up, I never had any problem not trying to  abscond with the name Creedence as a solo artist,&#8221; Fogerty told another  publication. &#8220;I just think that thing is from a certain time and it is  untouchable, unless everybody is there. You can&#8217;t do it unless everyone  says it is OK to do it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The comments appear to have upset Fogerty&#8217;s former band members.  Attorneys demanded a stop to Fogerty\u2019s alleged malfeasance and  settlement agreement breach. With Fogerty said to be threatening  litigation again over money, the other Creedence parties are going to  court first. They not only allege that Fogerty has breached the  settlement agreement by publicly condemning use of &#8220;Revisited,&#8221; but that  Fogerty himself is now violating the band&#8217;s trademarks.<\/p>\n<p>The attached exhibits to the lawsuit indicate that Fogerty has  recently been advertising concerts where he &#8220;performs the albums of  Creedence Clearwater Revival.&#8221; The plaintiffs now claim that such use of  the band&#8217;s name is likely to cause confusion among the consuming  public.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Source: Billboard Biz<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A long festering dispute over who gets to use the name of the popular 1960s&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4841\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}