{"id":4041,"date":"2014-02-07T06:37:24","date_gmt":"2014-02-07T06:37:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/skylight.gr\/administrator_wordpress\/index.php\/2014\/02\/07\/record-labels-seek-to-punish-siriusxm-over-pre-1972-music\/"},"modified":"2014-02-07T06:37:24","modified_gmt":"2014-02-07T06:37:24","slug":"record-labels-seek-to-punish-siriusxm-over-pre-1972-music","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/2014\/02\/07\/record-labels-seek-to-punish-siriusxm-over-pre-1972-music\/","title":{"rendered":"Record Labels Seek to Punish SiriusXM Over Pre-1972 Music"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/2\/24\/Led_Zeppelin_acoustic_1973.jpg\/220px-Led_Zeppelin_acoustic_1973.jpg\" border=\"0\" \/><br \/>A lawsuit brought by the major record labels &#8212; Sony, Universal,  Warner &#8212; against SiriusXM has barely begun, and yet the case is  skipping ahead to the issue of jury instruction. This is a dispute that is four decades in the making, ever since  sound recordings began falling under federal copyright protection. The  question the lawsuit poses is what to do about sound recordings created  before 1972. The plaintiffs are attempting to use California state  misappropriation claims to punish SiriusXM for allegedly not paying  royalties.   <!--more-->  <\/p>\n<p>To settle the issue, a California judge will need to decide whether  California laws protect the public performance of pre-72 music. And so,  the record labels have filed a motion so that a judge will clarify the  law.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs believe this case is about fairness.<\/p>\n<p>According to its motion, &#8220;Sirius XM unabashedly seeks to attract  users to its service by offering channels dedicated to Pre-72 Recordings  (including 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s channels) and by using Pre-72  Recordings to promote its channels, such as by using classic Rolling  Stones recordings to advertise the &#8216;Deep Tracks&#8217; channel and, just last  week, highlighting the works of the late singer\/songwriter Pete Seeger  on Sirius XM&#8217;s &#8216;The Village&#8217; and &#8216;Outlaw Country&#8217; channels.  Notwithstanding the bounty that Sirius XM is receiving from its  unfettered use of some of the most iconic sound recordings of all time \u2014  including recordings by artists such as the Beatles, the Rolling  Stones, Led Zeppelin, The Supremes, Bob Dylan, and hundreds of others \u2014  it refuses to pay the artists who created those cultural treasures, and  those who own the rights to them, any portion of the millions of dollars  Sirius XM makes each year from those Pre-72 Recordings.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Case law on the topic of the digital performance of pre-72 recordings is scant.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs have identified one case &#8212; Capitol Records v.  BlueBeat &#8212; as acknowledging a defendant who &#8220;publicly performed&#8221; pre-72  recordings &#8220;without proper authorization,&#8221; although the truth of the  matter was that in that particular case, it was merely one district  judge&#8217;s opinion, didn&#8217;t go into depth on the topic and seemed to be  thrown in among many liabilities after the defendant had conceded it.<\/p>\n<p>SiriusXM is defending multiple lawsuits on the pre-72 issue, and in  one of the other class actions, a judge noted it was a matter of &#8220;first  impression.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The record labels are turning to one of their favorite lawyers &#8212;  Russell Frackman at Mitchell Silberberg &amp; Knupp &#8212; to handle the  lawsuit, which is potentially worth hundreds of millions of dollars and  could shake up satellite radio and more. After all, in its own court  papers, SiriusXM has hinted the issue of pre-72 music could impact &#8220;a  wide variety of music users, including radio and television  broadcasters, bars, restaurants and website operators.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It might have taken four decades to settle the issue of pre-72 music,  but now the plaintiffs want the law clarified right away. In the motion  for jury instruction (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/205252518\/Label-Sirius\" target=\"_blank\">read in full here<\/a>), the plaintiffs say it won&#8217;t &#8220;implicate any proposed affirmative defenses that Sirius XM may later assert.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>One of the expected defense is laches &#8212; that the plaintiffs prejudiced the situation by waiting so long to bring claims.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Source: Billboard<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A lawsuit brought by the major record labels &#8212; Sony, Universal, Warner &#8212; against SiriusXM&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4041","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4041"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4041\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skylight.gr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}